In Mary Elizabeth Walsh-Morales v. Jon D. Morales, Docket No. A0524-09T2 (Appellate Division, November 5, 2010), the state appeals court reiterated the legal standard in New Jersey which must be met before a divorced parent will be permitted to remove a child to another state.
Plaintiff, a divorced mother, told defendant, her former husband, that she planned to remarry and move to another state with their daughter. Defendant immediately brought a court action barring her from removing their daughter out-of-state or, in the alternative, to obtain sole custody of their daughter in New Jersey. The trial court, finding that the mother’s proposed modification of the parents’ custody arrangement was not in the daughter’s best interests, denied plaintiff’s request.
Plaintiff appealed. The appeals court analyzed the plaintiff’s request in light of the applicable legal standard. To do so, the court first identified the preliminary question: whether plaintiff’s action should be considered a removal case or a motion for a change in custody. In a removal case, physical custody and parental responsibility are jointly shared. The amount of time which the parent spends with the child and the division of primary caretaking duties that are performed by each parent are examined to determine whether physical custody and parental responsibility are truly shared jointly by the parents. If so, a more stringent legal standard is applied: the parent who wants to relocate is required to show changed circumstances sufficient to warrant obtaining primary physical custody.
When physical custody is not jointly shared, a less stringent standard is applied. In that case, an application by the parent who is the residential custodian is considered to be a motion for a change in custody. The application will be granted if it is made in good faith and is not inimical to the child’s best interests.
After setting forth the applicable legal standard, the appeals court considered the evidence adduced at trial. Based on the frequency with which defendant assumed the responsibility for his daughter’s food, clothing, morning and nighttime care, education and activities, the appeals court, like the trial court, concluded that the parents truly shared physical custody and responsibility. Under these facts, plaintiff had to show changed circumstances to removal her child out of state, which the court concluded that she failed to do.
The case is annexed here – Mary Elizabeth Walsh-Morales v. Jon D. Morales
Categories
- Affordable Care Act
- Alzheimer's Disease
- Arbitration
- Attorney Ethics
- Attorneys Fees
- Beneficiary Designations
- Blog Roundup and Highlights
- Blogs and Blogging
- Care Facilities
- Caregivers
- Cemetery
- Collaborative Family Law
- Conservatorships
- Consumer Fraud
- Contempt
- Contracts
- Defamation
- Developmental Disabilities
- Discovery
- Discrimination Laws
- Doctrine of Probable Intent
- Domestic Violence
- Elder Abuse
- Elder Law
- Elective Share
- End-of-Life Decisions
- Estate Administration
- Estate Litigation
- Estate Planning
- Events
- Family Law
- Fiduciary
- Financial Exploitation of the Elderly
- Funeral
- Future of the Legal Profession
- Geriatric Care Managers
- Governmental or Public Benefit Programs
- Guardianship
- Health Issues
- Housing for the Elderly and Disabled
- In Remembrance
- Insolvent Estates
- Institutional Liens
- Insurance
- Interesting New Cases
- Intestacy
- Law Firm News
- Law Firm Videos
- Law Practice Management / Development
- Lawyers and Lawyering
- Legal Capacity or Competancy
- Legal Malpractice
- Legal Rights of the Disabled
- Liens
- Litigation
- Mediation
- Medicaid Appeals
- Medicaid Applications
- Medicaid Planning
- Annuities
- Care Contracts
- Divorce
- Estate Recovery
- Family Part Non-Dissolution Support Orders
- Gifts
- Life Estates
- Loan repayments
- MMMNA
- Promissory Notes
- Qualified Income Trusts
- Spousal Refusal
- Transfers For Reasons Other Than To Qualify For Medicaid
- Transfers to "Caregiver" Child(ren)
- Transfers to Disabled Adult Children
- Trusts
- Undue Hardship Provision
- Multiple-Party Deposit Account Act
- New Cases
- New Laws
- News Briefs
- Newsletters
- Non-Probate Assets
- Nursing Facility Litigation
- Personal Achievements and Awards
- Personal Injury Lawsuits
- Probate
- Punitive Damages
- Reconsideration
- Retirement Benefits
- Reverse Mortgages
- Section 8 Housing
- Settlement of Litigation
- Social Media
- Special Education
- Special Needs Planning
- Surrogate Decision-Making
- Taxation
- Technology
- Texting
- Top Ten
- Trials
- Trustees
- Uncategorized
- Veterans Benefits
- Web Sites and the Internet
- Webinar
- Writing Intended To Be A Will
Vanarelli & Li, LLC on Social Media