New Jersey appellate court ruled that an anonymous online commenter must reveal his or her identity to members of a church who claim the commenter defamed them. Mauro v. Intellectual Freedom Foundation, Docket No. A-0004-15T2 (App. Div., February 26, 2016)
Plaintiffs were members of the World Mission Society Church of God (WMS). WMS was founded in South Korea in 1985 and its members are known for proselytizing house to house, in shopping malls, on college campuses and in hospitals.
WMS filed a complaint against the Intellectual Freedom Foundation, Inc. (IFF), and several fictitiously-named individuals whose identities were not known at the time the complaint was filed. Plaintiffs claimed defendants defamed plaintiffs, cast them in a false light, and caused them emotional distress through postings that appeared on a website operated by IFF (the website). The complaint cited two postings from “Carlos Doe,” one of the fictitiously-named defendants, intimating that two individual plaintiffs were engaged in an extramarital affair, and that the plaintiffs used “‘sexual innuendo'” to recruit new members to join WMS.
Plaintiffs posted legal notices on the website to give defendant posters a chance to present arguments in court to block a subpoena sought by plaintiffs to unmask the identities of the fictitiously-named defendants. One of those fictitiously-named defendants, “Carlos Doe,” moved for a protective order, which was denied by the trial judge, who also granted a stay. The appellate division granted Doe’s motion for leave to appeal.
On appeal, Doe argued that plaintiffs’ notices were untimely and ineffective, that plaintiffs failed to set forth a prima facie case of defamation, and that disclosure would chill his or her free speech rights and those of other internet users. The appeals court disagreed, and affirmed the ruling of the trial court. In that regard, the appeals court held that plaintiffs’ notices were timely and effective, and that plaintiffs set forth a prima facie case of defamation.
The appellate court also rejected defendant’s claim based upon his or her First Amendment right of free speech. The court ruled that:
[A]ccusing individuals of adultery in a public forum is not the kind of robust, publicly-spirited debate entitled to the protections of the First Amendment. Individuals choosing to harm another . . . through speech on the Internet cannot hope to shield their identity and avoid punishment through invocation of the First Amendment.
The case is annexed here – Mauro v. Intellectual Freedom Foundation
Categories
- Affordable Care Act
- Alzheimer's Disease
- Arbitration
- Attorney Ethics
- Attorneys Fees
- Beneficiary Designations
- Blog Roundup and Highlights
- Blogs and Blogging
- Care Facilities
- Caregivers
- Cemetery
- Collaborative Family Law
- Conservatorships
- Consumer Fraud
- Contempt
- Contracts
- Defamation
- Developmental Disabilities
- Discovery
- Discrimination Laws
- Doctrine of Probable Intent
- Domestic Violence
- Elder Abuse
- Elder Law
- Elective Share
- End-of-Life Decisions
- Estate Administration
- Estate Litigation
- Estate Planning
- Events
- Family Law
- Fiduciary
- Financial Exploitation of the Elderly
- Funeral
- Future of the Legal Profession
- Geriatric Care Managers
- Governmental or Public Benefit Programs
- Guardianship
- Health Issues
- Housing for the Elderly and Disabled
- In Remembrance
- Insolvent Estates
- Institutional Liens
- Insurance
- Interesting New Cases
- Intestacy
- Law Firm News
- Law Firm Videos
- Law Practice Management / Development
- Lawyers and Lawyering
- Legal Capacity or Competancy
- Legal Malpractice
- Legal Rights of the Disabled
- Liens
- Litigation
- Mediation
- Medicaid Appeals
- Medicaid Applications
- Medicaid Planning
- Annuities
- Care Contracts
- Divorce
- Estate Recovery
- Family Part Non-Dissolution Support Orders
- Gifts
- Life Estates
- Loan repayments
- MMMNA
- Promissory Notes
- Qualified Income Trusts
- Spousal Refusal
- Transfers For Reasons Other Than To Qualify For Medicaid
- Transfers to "Caregiver" Child(ren)
- Transfers to Disabled Adult Children
- Trusts
- Undue Hardship Provision
- Multiple-Party Deposit Account Act
- New Cases
- New Laws
- News Briefs
- Newsletters
- Non-Probate Assets
- Nursing Facility Litigation
- Personal Achievements and Awards
- Personal Injury Lawsuits
- Probate
- Punitive Damages
- Reconsideration
- Retirement Benefits
- Reverse Mortgages
- Section 8 Housing
- Settlement of Litigation
- Social Media
- Special Education
- Special Needs Planning
- Surrogate Decision-Making
- Taxation
- Technology
- Texting
- Top Ten
- Trials
- Trustees
- Uncategorized
- Veterans Benefits
- Web Sites and the Internet
- Webinar
- Writing Intended To Be A Will
Vanarelli & Li, LLC on Social Media