In a decision that could have a big impact on all bloggers in New Jersey, a New Jersey trial judge ruled a self-declared “citizen watchdog” blogger has the same legal protections as a professional journalist. In re January 11, 2013 Subpoena by the Grand Jury of Union County, New Jersey, Prosecutor’s Docket No. 12 – 0001.
Plaintiff, Tina Renna, is the primary writer and editor of a blog entitled “The County Watchers.” The blog is located on the website of the Union County Watchdog Association (UCWA), an advocacy group that reports on waste, corruption and mismanagement in Union County, NJ. Plaintiff is the President of UCWA.
Ms. Renna authored two articles posted on “The County Watchers” blog in which she claimed to know the identities of sixteen county employees who used county-owned generators for personal use in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy. The Union County Prosecutor asked her to speak with county investigators about the matter. When she failed to respond, the Prosecutor issued a grand jury subpoena seeking to compel her testimony about her knowledge of the alleged improper use of the county generators.
Ms. Renna filed an Order to Show Cause to quash the subpoena, claiming it violated the Newsperson’s Privilege contained in New Jersey’s Shield Law, N.J.S.A. 2A:84A-21, et seq. which protects journalists from being forced to disclose information or sources obtained during professional news gathering activities. The New Jersey Shield Law has been described as providing the press in this State with the strongest possible protection from compulsory testimony in the nation.
In order to claim protection under the Newsperson’s Privilege, the Court found that three factors must be shown: (1) the claimant must demonstrate a nexus, connection or relationship to the news media; (2) the purpose of the claimant’s actions must be to gather and disseminate news; and (3) the materials sought to be protected must have been obtained in the course of professional newsgathering activities.
After holding a 2-day hearing at which Ms. Renna was the sole witness, analyzing the facts and reviewing the complicated law in this area, Judge Karen M. Cassidy, Assignment Judge for the Superior Court of New Jersey, Union County, ruled that Ms. Renna qualified for the Newsperson’s Privilege contained in New Jersey’s Shield Law because she met the three factors described above. First, the Court found that “The County Watchers” blog contained many posts by Ms. Renna and other bloggers about Union County governance and politics not covered by other news sources. Second, the Court ruled that Ms. Renna, the UCWA and “The County Watchers” blog had the requisite purpose of gathering and disseminating the news about Union County governance and politics to the general public. Third, the Court found that Ms. Renna’s activities and investigatory methods while gathering information for blog posts were part of her editorial process and therefore protected under the law. While acknowledging that the quality of Ms. Renna’s writing was not that of a professional reporter due to her use of profanity, poor grammar and bias, the Court ruled that a claimant need not be a professional to obtain protection under the Newsperson’s Privilege. As a result, the Court entered an Order quashing the grand jury subpoena.
The Court’s decision is annexed here – In re January 11, 2013 Subpoena by the Grand Jury of Union County, New Jersey
Memorandum of Law in Support of Ms. Renna’s Motion to Quash Subpoena – Memorandum of Law in Support of Order to Quash Grand Jury Subpeana
Reply Letter Brief in Support of Ms. Renna’s Motion to Quash Subpoena – Reply letter brief in support of motion to quash subpoena
Certification of Tina Renna in Support of Motion to Quash Subpoena – Certification of Tina Renna with Exhibits
Categories
- Affordable Care Act
- Alzheimer's Disease
- Arbitration
- Attorney Ethics
- Attorneys Fees
- Beneficiary Designations
- Blog Roundup and Highlights
- Blogs and Blogging
- Care Facilities
- Caregivers
- Cemetery
- Collaborative Family Law
- Conservatorships
- Consumer Fraud
- Contempt
- Contracts
- Defamation
- Developmental Disabilities
- Discovery
- Discrimination Laws
- Doctrine of Probable Intent
- Domestic Violence
- Elder Abuse
- Elder Law
- Elective Share
- End-of-Life Decisions
- Estate Administration
- Estate Litigation
- Estate Planning
- Events
- Family Law
- Fiduciary
- Financial Exploitation of the Elderly
- Funeral
- Future of the Legal Profession
- Geriatric Care Managers
- Governmental or Public Benefit Programs
- Guardianship
- Health Issues
- Housing for the Elderly and Disabled
- In Remembrance
- Insolvent Estates
- Institutional Liens
- Insurance
- Interesting New Cases
- Intestacy
- Law Firm News
- Law Firm Videos
- Law Practice Management / Development
- Lawyers and Lawyering
- Legal Capacity or Competancy
- Legal Malpractice
- Legal Rights of the Disabled
- Liens
- Litigation
- Mediation
- Medicaid Appeals
- Medicaid Applications
- Medicaid Planning
- Annuities
- Care Contracts
- Divorce
- Estate Recovery
- Family Part Non-Dissolution Support Orders
- Gifts
- Life Estates
- Loan repayments
- MMMNA
- Promissory Notes
- Qualified Income Trusts
- Spousal Refusal
- Transfers For Reasons Other Than To Qualify For Medicaid
- Transfers to "Caregiver" Child(ren)
- Transfers to Disabled Adult Children
- Trusts
- Undue Hardship Provision
- Multiple-Party Deposit Account Act
- New Cases
- New Laws
- News Briefs
- Newsletters
- Non-Probate Assets
- Nursing Facility Litigation
- Personal Achievements and Awards
- Personal Injury Lawsuits
- Probate
- Punitive Damages
- Reconsideration
- Retirement Benefits
- Reverse Mortgages
- Section 8 Housing
- Settlement of Litigation
- Social Media
- Special Education
- Special Needs Planning
- Surrogate Decision-Making
- Taxation
- Technology
- Texting
- Top Ten
- Trials
- Trustees
- Uncategorized
- Veterans Benefits
- Web Sites and the Internet
- Webinar
- Writing Intended To Be A Will
Vanarelli & Li, LLC on Social Media