In a trio of cases which were consolidated because the cases presented a common question of law, NJ Administrative Law Judge Joseph A. Paone recently ruled that a Medicaid applicant’s prepayment for personal care services to be provided in the future by a family member under a Life Care Contract constituted a transfer of assets for less than fair market value, subjecting the applicant to the imposition of a penalty period under the Medicaid program. C.S. v. Division of Medical Assistance and Health Services and Union County Board of Social Services, et al., OAL Docket No. HMA 1036 – 08, Initial Decision (September 8, 2008).
Each of the petitioners in the consolidated cases entered into a written contract with a relative which obligated the relative to provide life care services in exchange for a prepaid fee based on the actuarial life expectancy of that petitioner. Petitioners asserted that the contracts were evidence that the payments made for services to be provided in the future were bona fide. Petitioners applied for Medicaid but were denied eligibility after respondents county welfare boards and the State Medicaid agency imposed transfer penalties, holding that each petitioner’s payment to a relative under the contract constituted an uncompensated transfer of assets, subjecting each petitioner to a penalty period.
Petitioners filed appeals from the denial of Medicaid benefits, requesting Fair Hearings. Respondents then moved for summary decision in each case. On appeal, ALJ Paone ruled that, since the value of an asset under the Medicaid regulations [N.J.A.C. 10:71-4.1(d)] is defined as “ the price that the resource can reasonable be expected to sell for on the open market in the particular geographic area . . .”, and since each Life Care Contract prohibited the sale, transfer or assignment of any rights or benefits conferred by the contract,
[Each contract] lacks intrinsic value and, thus, possess[es] no fair market value. Consequently, the sum paid to a relative for personal care services pursuant to the Life Care Contract constitutes a transfer of assets for less than fair market value.
A copy of the C.S. v. Division of Medical Assistance and Health Services and Union County Board of Social Services case can be found here – cs-v-dmahs. An appeal of the ALJ’s decision is planned.
Categories
- Affordable Care Act
- Alzheimer's Disease
- Arbitration
- Attorney Ethics
- Attorneys Fees
- Beneficiary Designations
- Blog Roundup and Highlights
- Blogs and Blogging
- Care Facilities
- Caregivers
- Cemetery
- Collaborative Family Law
- Conservatorships
- Consumer Fraud
- Contempt
- Contracts
- Defamation
- Developmental Disabilities
- Discovery
- Discrimination Laws
- Doctrine of Probable Intent
- Domestic Violence
- Elder Abuse
- Elder Law
- Elective Share
- End-of-Life Decisions
- Estate Administration
- Estate Litigation
- Estate Planning
- Events
- Family Law
- Fiduciary
- Financial Exploitation of the Elderly
- Funeral
- Future of the Legal Profession
- Geriatric Care Managers
- Governmental or Public Benefit Programs
- Guardianship
- Health Issues
- Housing for the Elderly and Disabled
- In Remembrance
- Insolvent Estates
- Institutional Liens
- Insurance
- Interesting New Cases
- Intestacy
- Law Firm News
- Law Firm Videos
- Law Practice Management / Development
- Lawyers and Lawyering
- Legal Capacity or Competancy
- Legal Malpractice
- Legal Rights of the Disabled
- Liens
- Litigation
- Mediation
- Medicaid Appeals
- Medicaid Applications
- Medicaid Planning
- Annuities
- Care Contracts
- Divorce
- Estate Recovery
- Family Part Non-Dissolution Support Orders
- Gifts
- Life Estates
- Loan repayments
- MMMNA
- Promissory Notes
- Qualified Income Trusts
- Spousal Refusal
- Transfers For Reasons Other Than To Qualify For Medicaid
- Transfers to "Caregiver" Child(ren)
- Transfers to Disabled Adult Children
- Trusts
- Undue Hardship Provision
- Multiple-Party Deposit Account Act
- New Cases
- New Laws
- News Briefs
- Newsletters
- Non-Probate Assets
- Nursing Facility Litigation
- Personal Achievements and Awards
- Personal Injury Lawsuits
- Probate
- Punitive Damages
- Reconsideration
- Retirement Benefits
- Reverse Mortgages
- Section 8 Housing
- Settlement of Litigation
- Social Media
- Special Education
- Special Needs Planning
- Surrogate Decision-Making
- Taxation
- Technology
- Texting
- Top Ten
- Trials
- Trustees
- Uncategorized
- Veterans Benefits
- Web Sites and the Internet
- Webinar
- Writing Intended To Be A Will
Vanarelli & Li, LLC on Social Media