Ohio’s First District Court of Appeals has joined other state and federal courts across the country in ruling recently that Ohio improperly imposed a penalty period on a Medicaid applicant whose wife purchased an annuity during the look-back period. The Court held that Ohio’s regulations regarding the purchase of annuities are improperly restrictive, and are preempted by more liberal federal law.
In Rorick v. Ohio Department of Job and Family Services, (Ohio Ct. App., 1st Dist., No. C–090627, November 19, 2010), the applicant, Paul Rorick (“Paul”), was admitted to a nursing home in May 2008. his wife, Betty Rorick (“Betty”), was not institutionalized and remained living in the community. At the time of his institutionalization, the couple’s combined resources were approximately $74,224.61. In July 2008, Betty purchased a single premium immediate annuity for $14,562.55 that provided a monthly payment to her of $136.22 for 10 years. Paul was the primary beneficiary and the State of Ohio was the secondary beneficiary. In August 2008, Paul applied for nursing-home Medicaid benefits.
The local Medicaid agency determined that Betty’s annuity purchase, paid for after the date of Paul’s institutionalization, constituted an “improper transfer of assets” made by the couple to reach the Medicaid resource eligibility limit. As a result, the local Medicaid agency suspended Medicaid payments for Paul’s nursing-home care for a period of two and one-half months.
Paul appealed. After a hearing, a hearings officer denied Paul’s appeal. The Bureau of State Hearings later affirmed the hearings officer’s decision. Paul appealed State’s decision to the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas. The trial court ruled in Paul’s favor, holding that it was a violation of the Medicaid Catastrophic Coverage Act, federal Medicaid law and the Supremacy Clause in the U.S. Constitution for the annuity purchase to be treated as an improper transfer.
The State of Ohio then filed an appeal. Ohio’s Court of Appeals affirmed, holding that Ohio cannot use a Medicaid eligibility methodology based on resources and income in a manner that is more restrictive than the resource standards of the Supplemental Security Income program.
The case is attached here – Rorick v. Ohio Department of Job and Family Services
Categories
- Affordable Care Act
- Alzheimer's Disease
- Arbitration
- Attorney Ethics
- Attorneys Fees
- Beneficiary Designations
- Blog Roundup and Highlights
- Blogs and Blogging
- Care Facilities
- Caregivers
- Cemetery
- Collaborative Family Law
- Conservatorships
- Consumer Fraud
- Contempt
- Contracts
- Defamation
- Developmental Disabilities
- Discovery
- Discrimination Laws
- Doctrine of Probable Intent
- Domestic Violence
- Elder Abuse
- Elder Law
- Elective Share
- End-of-Life Decisions
- Estate Administration
- Estate Litigation
- Estate Planning
- Events
- Family Law
- Fiduciary
- Financial Exploitation of the Elderly
- Funeral
- Future of the Legal Profession
- Geriatric Care Managers
- Governmental or Public Benefit Programs
- Guardianship
- Health Issues
- Housing for the Elderly and Disabled
- In Remembrance
- Insolvent Estates
- Institutional Liens
- Insurance
- Interesting New Cases
- Intestacy
- Law Firm News
- Law Firm Videos
- Law Practice Management / Development
- Lawyers and Lawyering
- Legal Capacity or Competancy
- Legal Malpractice
- Legal Rights of the Disabled
- Liens
- Litigation
- Mediation
- Medicaid Appeals
- Medicaid Applications
- Medicaid Planning
- Annuities
- Care Contracts
- Divorce
- Estate Recovery
- Family Part Non-Dissolution Support Orders
- Gifts
- Life Estates
- Loan repayments
- MMMNA
- Promissory Notes
- Qualified Income Trusts
- Spousal Refusal
- Transfers For Reasons Other Than To Qualify For Medicaid
- Transfers to "Caregiver" Child(ren)
- Transfers to Disabled Adult Children
- Trusts
- Undue Hardship Provision
- Multiple-Party Deposit Account Act
- New Cases
- New Laws
- News Briefs
- Newsletters
- Non-Probate Assets
- Nursing Facility Litigation
- Personal Achievements and Awards
- Personal Injury Lawsuits
- Probate
- Punitive Damages
- Reconsideration
- Retirement Benefits
- Reverse Mortgages
- Section 8 Housing
- Settlement of Litigation
- Social Media
- Special Education
- Special Needs Planning
- Surrogate Decision-Making
- Taxation
- Technology
- Texting
- Top Ten
- Trials
- Trustees
- Uncategorized
- Veterans Benefits
- Web Sites and the Internet
- Webinar
- Writing Intended To Be A Will
Vanarelli & Li, LLC on Social Media