A court in Connecticut ruled that the administrator of an estate lacked standing to appeal the denial of an application for Medicaid benefits because no appeal of the denial was filed before the decedent died. Freese v. Department of Social Services (Conn. Super. Ct., No. CV14-6047417S, June 1, 2015).
Plaintiff, Kathleen Freese, claimed that the defendant, Department of Social Services (“DSS”), erred in finding her deceased mother, Noreen Mccusker, ineligible for Medicaid. Ms. Freeze was her mother’s conservator when her mother was alive. After her mother died, plaintiff was appointed administrator of her mother’s estate. Plaintiff filed a Medicaid appeal on her deceased mother’s behalf approx. one month before she was appointed administrator.
DSS challenged Ms. Freese’s standing to sue on her mother’s behalf, asserting that nothing in the law authorized a conservator to sue in a deceased person’s place, and that Ms. Freese had not been appointed administrator of her mother’s estate when she filed the appeal. Ms. Freese countered that any defect in her standing to file the appeal could be cured by substituting her into the pending lawsuit in her capacity as administrator of her mother’s estate retroactively to the date the appeal was filed.
The Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Fairfield at Bridgeport, disagreed. The court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, holding that Ms. McCusker was the real party in interest and, because she died before appealing the denial of Medicaid benefits, her estate’s administrator lacked standing to sue in her place.
For the full text of this decision, click here – Freese v. Department of Social Services
For additional information concerning Medicaid applications and appeals, visit: https://vanarellilaw.com/medicaid-applications-medicaid-appeals/
Categories
- Affordable Care Act
- Alzheimer's Disease
- Arbitration
- Attorney Ethics
- Attorneys Fees
- Beneficiary Designations
- Blog Roundup and Highlights
- Blogs and Blogging
- Care Facilities
- Caregivers
- Cemetery
- Collaborative Family Law
- Conservatorships
- Consumer Fraud
- Contempt
- Contracts
- Defamation
- Developmental Disabilities
- Discovery
- Discrimination Laws
- Doctrine of Probable Intent
- Domestic Violence
- Elder Abuse
- Elder Law
- Elective Share
- End-of-Life Decisions
- Estate Administration
- Estate Litigation
- Estate Planning
- Events
- Family Law
- Fiduciary
- Financial Exploitation of the Elderly
- Funeral
- Future of the Legal Profession
- Geriatric Care Managers
- Governmental or Public Benefit Programs
- Guardianship
- Health Issues
- Housing for the Elderly and Disabled
- In Remembrance
- Insolvent Estates
- Institutional Liens
- Insurance
- Interesting New Cases
- Intestacy
- Law Firm News
- Law Firm Videos
- Law Practice Management / Development
- Lawyers and Lawyering
- Legal Capacity or Competancy
- Legal Malpractice
- Legal Rights of the Disabled
- Liens
- Litigation
- Mediation
- Medicaid Appeals
- Medicaid Applications
- Medicaid Planning
- Annuities
- Care Contracts
- Divorce
- Estate Recovery
- Family Part Non-Dissolution Support Orders
- Gifts
- Life Estates
- Loan repayments
- MMMNA
- Promissory Notes
- Qualified Income Trusts
- Spousal Refusal
- Transfers For Reasons Other Than To Qualify For Medicaid
- Transfers to "Caregiver" Child(ren)
- Transfers to Disabled Adult Children
- Trusts
- Undue Hardship Provision
- Multiple-Party Deposit Account Act
- New Cases
- New Laws
- News Briefs
- Newsletters
- Non-Probate Assets
- Nursing Facility Litigation
- Personal Achievements and Awards
- Personal Injury Lawsuits
- Probate
- Punitive Damages
- Reconsideration
- Retirement Benefits
- Reverse Mortgages
- Section 8 Housing
- Settlement of Litigation
- Social Media
- Special Education
- Special Needs Planning
- Surrogate Decision-Making
- Taxation
- Technology
- Texting
- Top Ten
- Trials
- Trustees
- Uncategorized
- Veterans Benefits
- Web Sites and the Internet
- Webinar
- Writing Intended To Be A Will
Vanarelli & Li, LLC on Social Media