After Mrs. Dreher died and her son probated her will, her daughter filed a complaint objecting to the probate. The plaintiff claimed that the will was the product of undue influence, and that her mother lacked testamentary capacity to sign the will.
After four days of trial, the parties settled the case, and the terms of the settlement agreement were placed on the record. The settlement agreement provided that the net estate would be divided equally between the plaintiff and defendant, and that plaintiff would receive an immediate advance on her distribution in the amount of $100,000.
Thereafter, the defendant forwarded a refunding bond to the plaintiff and asked that it be signed so that the $100,000 distribution could be made. The plaintiff signed the refunding bond, but deleted the “refunding provision,” which required the distribution to be returned in the event that the estate owed debts or taxes that could not be satisfied with the remaining estate funds. The defendant refused to distribute the $100,000 without that provision.
The plaintiff then filed a motion to enforce litigant’s rights, seeking to compel the defendant to make the $100,000 distribution without being subject to the refunding provision.
The probate judge denied the plaintiff’s motion, reasoning that the $100,000 was not a cash settlement payment, but was an early distribution of the plaintiff’s share of the estate. Therefore,
Due to the nature of the distributions, as opposed to cash settlement payments, the refunding bond requirement of N.J.S.A 3B:23-24 applies…. Defendant … is requesting a Refunding Bond and Release … [and] it is Plaintiff’s own actions preventing the early distribution from the Estate.
On appeal, the Appellate Division affirmed the probate judge’s decision. It reasoned that,
N.J.S.A. 3B:23-24 requires the personal representative of an estate to obtain a refunding bond in order to make any distribution prior to the closing of the estate, and N.J.S.A. 3B:23-26 requires the bond to be conditioned on the devisee returning any portion of the distribution if later needed to discharge any debt.
Therefore, because the parties’ settlement agreement provided that the $100,000 was a distribution from the estate, these statutes applied and the defendant was “statutorily obligated” to require a refunding bond prior to releasing the funds.
A copy of Estate of Dreher can be found here – IMO Estate of Dorothy Dreher
For additional information concerning probate litigation and will contests, visit:
Categories
- Affordable Care Act
- Alzheimer's Disease
- Arbitration
- Attorney Ethics
- Attorneys Fees
- Beneficiary Designations
- Blog Roundup and Highlights
- Blogs and Blogging
- Care Facilities
- Caregivers
- Cemetery
- Collaborative Family Law
- Conservatorships
- Consumer Fraud
- Contempt
- Contracts
- Defamation
- Developmental Disabilities
- Discovery
- Discrimination Laws
- Doctrine of Probable Intent
- Domestic Violence
- Elder Abuse
- Elder Law
- Elective Share
- End-of-Life Decisions
- Estate Administration
- Estate Litigation
- Estate Planning
- Events
- Family Law
- Fiduciary
- Financial Exploitation of the Elderly
- Funeral
- Future of the Legal Profession
- Geriatric Care Managers
- Governmental or Public Benefit Programs
- Guardianship
- Health Issues
- Housing for the Elderly and Disabled
- In Remembrance
- Insolvent Estates
- Institutional Liens
- Insurance
- Interesting New Cases
- Intestacy
- Law Firm News
- Law Firm Videos
- Law Practice Management / Development
- Lawyers and Lawyering
- Legal Capacity or Competancy
- Legal Malpractice
- Legal Rights of the Disabled
- Liens
- Litigation
- Mediation
- Medicaid Appeals
- Medicaid Applications
- Medicaid Planning
- Annuities
- Care Contracts
- Divorce
- Estate Recovery
- Family Part Non-Dissolution Support Orders
- Gifts
- Life Estates
- Loan repayments
- MMMNA
- Promissory Notes
- Qualified Income Trusts
- Spousal Refusal
- Transfers For Reasons Other Than To Qualify For Medicaid
- Transfers to "Caregiver" Child(ren)
- Transfers to Disabled Adult Children
- Trusts
- Undue Hardship Provision
- Multiple-Party Deposit Account Act
- New Cases
- New Laws
- News Briefs
- Newsletters
- Non-Probate Assets
- Nursing Facility Litigation
- Personal Achievements and Awards
- Personal Injury Lawsuits
- Probate
- Punitive Damages
- Reconsideration
- Retirement Benefits
- Reverse Mortgages
- Section 8 Housing
- Settlement of Litigation
- Social Media
- Special Education
- Special Needs Planning
- Surrogate Decision-Making
- Taxation
- Technology
- Texting
- Top Ten
- Trials
- Trustees
- Uncategorized
- Veterans Benefits
- Web Sites and the Internet
- Webinar
- Writing Intended To Be A Will
Vanarelli & Li, LLC on Social Media