In A.P. v. Division of Medical Assistance and Health Services, the Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court reversed a decision by the Bergen County Board of Social Services (BCBSS) that was affirmed by the Director of the state Medicaid agency, holding that the transfer of a family home to the sibling of two Medicaid applicants was an impermissible transfer for less than fair market value, subject to a penalty, or period of ineligibility for nursing home Medicaid benefits. The Appellate Division remanded the case “for additional determination consistent with our determination”.
Three sisters, identified in the case as A.P., M.P. and A.B., lived in a home for many years which they had inherited from their parents. A.P. and M.P both owned life estates in the home, or the legal right to live in the home for the remainder of their lives. A.P. also owned a contingent remainder interest in the home and A.B. owned the remainder interest. M.P. was developmentally disabled, and A.P. and A.B were her co-guardians.
As the sisters’ aged, both M.P. and A.P. required additional care, The sisters signed a mortgage encumbering their interests in the family home in the amount of $75,000 in favor of A.B., who then sold her own home and used $75,000 of the proceeds to construct an addition to the family home. A.B. lived in the addition since 1985.
After many years, both M.P. and A.P. required nursing home care. They transferred their interests in the family home to A.B. and applied for Medicaid. The BCBSS determined that the transfer of A.P.’s and M.P.’s interests in the family home to A.B. was an impermissible transfer for less than fair market value, and imposed a period of ineligibility for Medicaid. The Director of the state Medicaid agency affirmed the local Medicaid agency’s determination.
A.P. and M.P. appealed, and the Appellate Division reversed. The appellate court held that the Medicaid transfer rules permit applicants to transfer their interests in real estate without penalty to a sibling with an equity interest in the home who has lived in the home for at least one year. The court found that A.B. could be said to have met the requirements of the rule since the mortgage debt may be held to be an equity interest under state law. More importantly, however, the court held that the mortgage debt far exceeded the value of the applicants’ interest in the family home. That is, the value of the property transferred less the mortgage debt reduced the net value of the property transferred to zero, even if the transfer was impermissible. Accordingly, A.P. and M.P. were found to be eligible for Medicaid benefits notwithstanding the transfer.
Categories
- Affordable Care Act
- Alzheimer's Disease
- Arbitration
- Attorney Ethics
- Attorneys Fees
- Beneficiary Designations
- Blog Roundup and Highlights
- Blogs and Blogging
- Care Facilities
- Caregivers
- Cemetery
- Collaborative Family Law
- Conservatorships
- Consumer Fraud
- Contempt
- Contracts
- Defamation
- Developmental Disabilities
- Discovery
- Discrimination Laws
- Doctrine of Probable Intent
- Domestic Violence
- Elder Abuse
- Elder Law
- Elective Share
- End-of-Life Decisions
- Estate Administration
- Estate Litigation
- Estate Planning
- Events
- Family Law
- Fiduciary
- Financial Exploitation of the Elderly
- Funeral
- Future of the Legal Profession
- Geriatric Care Managers
- Governmental or Public Benefit Programs
- Guardianship
- Health Issues
- Housing for the Elderly and Disabled
- In Remembrance
- Insolvent Estates
- Institutional Liens
- Insurance
- Interesting New Cases
- Intestacy
- Law Firm News
- Law Firm Videos
- Law Practice Management / Development
- Lawyers and Lawyering
- Legal Capacity or Competancy
- Legal Malpractice
- Legal Rights of the Disabled
- Liens
- Litigation
- Mediation
- Medicaid Appeals
- Medicaid Applications
- Medicaid Planning
- Annuities
- Care Contracts
- Divorce
- Estate Recovery
- Family Part Non-Dissolution Support Orders
- Gifts
- Life Estates
- Loan repayments
- MMMNA
- Promissory Notes
- Qualified Income Trusts
- Spousal Refusal
- Transfers For Reasons Other Than To Qualify For Medicaid
- Transfers to "Caregiver" Child(ren)
- Transfers to Disabled Adult Children
- Trusts
- Undue Hardship Provision
- Multiple-Party Deposit Account Act
- New Cases
- New Laws
- News Briefs
- Newsletters
- Non-Probate Assets
- Nursing Facility Litigation
- Personal Achievements and Awards
- Personal Injury Lawsuits
- Probate
- Punitive Damages
- Reconsideration
- Retirement Benefits
- Reverse Mortgages
- Section 8 Housing
- Settlement of Litigation
- Social Media
- Special Education
- Special Needs Planning
- Surrogate Decision-Making
- Taxation
- Technology
- Texting
- Top Ten
- Trials
- Trustees
- Uncategorized
- Veterans Benefits
- Web Sites and the Internet
- Webinar
- Writing Intended To Be A Will
Vanarelli & Li, LLC on Social Media