Eddie and Aidaliz Jones married in 1998. They had a child in 2003, and were later divorced in 2009. When Eddie died, he was survived by his minor child as well as an emancipated adult child from a prior relationship.
Before the marriage, Eddie Jones enrolled under a group life insurance policy through the Police and Firemen’s Retirement System of New Jersey, naming his parents as beneficiaries and Aidaliz as the contingent beneficiary. When they divorced, Eddie and Aidaliz entered into a settlement agreement, later incorporated into their Amended Dual Final Judgment of Divorce, which made the following provision with respect to the life insurance policy:
5. LIFE INSURANCE – The Husband presently has life insurance on his life with a face amount of approximately $200,000.00. He shall name the minor child as beneficiary of $150,000.00 of that policy naming Wife as trustee. Husband shall continue this policy until the child is emancipated. Husband shall also maintain $50,000.00 of said policy naming Wife as beneficiary to secure his alimony obligation. This requirement for Husband to maintain life insurance naming Wife as beneficiary shall terminate upon the termination of alimony.
Eddie died intestate, and Aidaliz and his adult son were named co-administrators of the estate.
At the time of his death, Eddie had not named his minor child as the beneficiary of the life insurance policy. His parents (the primary beneficiaries under the original policy language) had predeceased Eddie, and Aidaliz’s designation as contingent beneficiary under the original policy language was revoked upon their divorce, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 3B:3-14. The policy provided that, in the absence of a beneficiary, the policy proceeds would be payable to the insured’s estate.
Aidaliz sought an order distributing the insurance proceeds pursuant to the judgment of divorce. The chancery judge granted this relief, finding that the decedent’s failure to revise the beneficiary designation to secure his child support and alimony obligations did not defeat the judgment of divorce. The chancery judge reformed the policy accordingly.
The chancery judge found that the current value of the policy was $160,002.09, and that Aideliz’s outstanding alimony of $10,400 would be paid from the policy to satisfy that amount. The judge ordered that the remaining proceeds be paid to Aidaliz, as trustee for the minor child. In so doing, she noted that the child’s projected child support through emancipation would probably equal that amount; therefore, there would be no windfall to the child as a result of the order. The adult child appealed.
The Appellate Division affirmed. As the appellate court explained, pursuant to Flanigan v. Munson, 175 N.J. 597 (2003), “[w]hen support is secured by a life insurance policy and the policy fails to provide such security because the policy names an incorrect beneficiary, the court may impose a constructive trust on all or a portion of the life insurance proceeds after the obligor’s death.” A constructive trust is warranted when the following two-prong test is satisfied:
First, a court must find that a party has committed “a wrongful act.” The act, however, need not be fraudulent to result in a constructive trust; a mere mistake is sufficient for these purposes. Second, the wrongful act must result in a transfer or diversion of property that unjustly enriches the recipient.
Id. Here, the Appellate Division noted that the Flanigan test had been met. The decedent’s failure to amend the policy beneficiary was a “wrongful act” that would result in the diversion of proceeds that would trump the property settlement agreement, and would constitute an unjust enrichment.
For these reasons, the Appellate Division concluded that the chancery judge’s reformation order was a proper exercise of her judicial authority to impose a constructive trust on the policy proceeds.
A copy of In re Estate of Jones can be found here – Matter of the Estate of Jones
For additional information concerning estate planning and administration, visit:
https://vanarellilaw.com/estate-planning-administration/
Categories
- Affordable Care Act
- Alzheimer's Disease
- Arbitration
- Attorney Ethics
- Attorneys Fees
- Beneficiary Designations
- Blog Roundup and Highlights
- Blogs and Blogging
- Care Facilities
- Caregivers
- Cemetery
- Collaborative Family Law
- Conservatorships
- Consumer Fraud
- Contempt
- Contracts
- Defamation
- Developmental Disabilities
- Discovery
- Discrimination Laws
- Doctrine of Probable Intent
- Domestic Violence
- Elder Abuse
- Elder Law
- Elective Share
- End-of-Life Decisions
- Estate Administration
- Estate Litigation
- Estate Planning
- Events
- Family Law
- Fiduciary
- Financial Exploitation of the Elderly
- Funeral
- Future of the Legal Profession
- Geriatric Care Managers
- Governmental or Public Benefit Programs
- Guardianship
- Health Issues
- Housing for the Elderly and Disabled
- In Remembrance
- Insolvent Estates
- Institutional Liens
- Insurance
- Interesting New Cases
- Intestacy
- Law Firm News
- Law Firm Videos
- Law Practice Management / Development
- Lawyers and Lawyering
- Legal Capacity or Competancy
- Legal Malpractice
- Legal Rights of the Disabled
- Liens
- Litigation
- Mediation
- Medicaid Appeals
- Medicaid Applications
- Medicaid Planning
- Annuities
- Care Contracts
- Divorce
- Estate Recovery
- Family Part Non-Dissolution Support Orders
- Gifts
- Life Estates
- Loan repayments
- MMMNA
- Promissory Notes
- Qualified Income Trusts
- Spousal Refusal
- Transfers For Reasons Other Than To Qualify For Medicaid
- Transfers to "Caregiver" Child(ren)
- Transfers to Disabled Adult Children
- Trusts
- Undue Hardship Provision
- Multiple-Party Deposit Account Act
- New Cases
- New Laws
- News Briefs
- Newsletters
- Non-Probate Assets
- Nursing Facility Litigation
- Personal Achievements and Awards
- Personal Injury Lawsuits
- Probate
- Punitive Damages
- Reconsideration
- Retirement Benefits
- Reverse Mortgages
- Section 8 Housing
- Settlement of Litigation
- Social Media
- Special Education
- Special Needs Planning
- Surrogate Decision-Making
- Taxation
- Technology
- Texting
- Top Ten
- Trials
- Trustees
- Uncategorized
- Veterans Benefits
- Web Sites and the Internet
- Webinar
- Writing Intended To Be A Will
Vanarelli & Li, LLC on Social Media