In the article below, I discussed some interesting (I hope) developments in the rules governing attorney ethics in New Jersey. I also provided links to other ethics resources at the end of the article.
Bona Fide Office Rule:
Under New Jersey’s “bona fide office rule”, lawyers must have an office where confidential information can be kept securely, where face-to-face discussions with clients are private and where someone can make sure the attorney is “reachable by telephone or e-mail during the occasional absences.” The rule arose decades ago to protect New Jersey attorneys against competition from lawyers from New York and Philadelphia by making it much more expensive for out-of-state lawyers to practice law in New Jersey.
Most states have abandoned the bona fide office rule. New Jersey has not. In fact, It appears that the rule has been strengthened. In a joint decision by the New Jersey Supreme Court‘s Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics (Op. 718) and the Advisory Committee on Attorney Advertising (Op. 41), the committees held that a so-called virtual office does not qualify as a bona fide office for purposes of N.J. Court Rule 1:21-1(a). (A virtual office, the opinion said, refers to a type of time-share arrangement whereby one leases space in an office building on an hourly or daily basis. The office is staffed by receptionists who provide answering services and the attorney sees clients by appointment only. The opinions are likely to reinforce New Jersey’s reputation as a state that changes its ethics rules slowly to accommodate social and economic change.
Out-Of-State Attorneys; Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR):
Under current Rule of Profession Conduct 5.5, an out-of-state attorney is not permitted to represent a New Jersey client in connection with a New Jersey dispute. In a report prepared by the Professional Responsibility Rules Committee (PRRC), the PRRC proposed an amendment to RPC 5.5 which would allow out-of-state lawyers to practice occasionally in New Jersey in particular matters if they associate with a New Jersey lawyer who would be responsible (though would not necessarily actively participate). The New Jersey Supreme Court is mulling over the recommendation. The Court has also postponed decision on a PRRC recommendation to exempt lawyers engaged in ADR from registering with the state bar and paying assessments.
Attorney Advertising:
Also still pending is a proposed new Advertising Guideline that would prohibit an attorney or law firm from including, on a website or other advertisement, ―a quotation from a judge or court opinion (oral or written) regarding the attorney‘s abilities or legal services. The New Jersey Supreme Court‘s Committee on Attorney Advertising proposed the new Guideline after reviewing an attorney‘s website that included two quotations from unpublished opinions on fee petitions in which judges praised the attorney‘s legal abilities.
Last year, the New Jersey Supreme Court changed the ethics rules to allow lawyers, for the first time, to mention their inclusion in Super Lawyers, Best Lawyers in America, the Martindale-Hubbell rankings or other rating services in advertisements and other promotional materials distributed to the public.
Mandatory Continuing Legal Education:
Last year, the New Jersey Supreme Court announced that mandatory continuing legal education will be required for all lawyers admitted to practice law in New Jersey starting in 2010. Under the new mandate, attorneys licensed in New Jersey, including judges, law school professors and in-house counsel, are required to take 24 hours of continuing legal education every two years, including 4 hours of ethics credits.
Ethics and Professional Responsibility Resources
New Jersey
- New Jersey Rules of Professional Conduct
- Rutgers Law School – Camden provides Opinions of the New Jersey Supreme Court’s Ethics Committee
- New Jersey Code of Judicial Conduct
- New Jersey Ethics Support Committee
- New Jersey Judiciary Ethics Telephone Research Hotline
American Bar Association
Section of Dispute Resolution
- Committee on Mediator Ethical Guidance
- Standing Committee on Ethics
- The Code of Ethics for Arbitrators in Commercial Disputes
- Model Standards of Conduct for Mediators
Section of Family Law
Section of Litigation
- Ethical Guidelines for Settlement Negotiations
- Ethics and Professionalism Committee
- Handbook on Limited Scope Legal Assistance
Section of Real Property, Probate, and Trust Law
Categories
- Affordable Care Act
- Alzheimer's Disease
- Arbitration
- Attorney Ethics
- Attorneys Fees
- Beneficiary Designations
- Blog Roundup and Highlights
- Blogs and Blogging
- Care Facilities
- Caregivers
- Cemetery
- Collaborative Family Law
- Conservatorships
- Consumer Fraud
- Contempt
- Contracts
- Defamation
- Developmental Disabilities
- Discovery
- Discrimination Laws
- Doctrine of Probable Intent
- Domestic Violence
- Elder Abuse
- Elder Law
- Elective Share
- End-of-Life Decisions
- Estate Administration
- Estate Litigation
- Estate Planning
- Events
- Family Law
- Fiduciary
- Financial Exploitation of the Elderly
- Funeral
- Future of the Legal Profession
- Geriatric Care Managers
- Governmental or Public Benefit Programs
- Guardianship
- Health Issues
- Housing for the Elderly and Disabled
- In Remembrance
- Insolvent Estates
- Institutional Liens
- Insurance
- Interesting New Cases
- Intestacy
- Law Firm News
- Law Firm Videos
- Law Practice Management / Development
- Lawyers and Lawyering
- Legal Capacity or Competancy
- Legal Malpractice
- Legal Rights of the Disabled
- Liens
- Litigation
- Mediation
- Medicaid Appeals
- Medicaid Applications
- Medicaid Planning
- Annuities
- Care Contracts
- Divorce
- Estate Recovery
- Family Part Non-Dissolution Support Orders
- Gifts
- Life Estates
- Loan repayments
- MMMNA
- Promissory Notes
- Qualified Income Trusts
- Spousal Refusal
- Transfers For Reasons Other Than To Qualify For Medicaid
- Transfers to "Caregiver" Child(ren)
- Transfers to Disabled Adult Children
- Trusts
- Undue Hardship Provision
- Multiple-Party Deposit Account Act
- New Cases
- New Laws
- News Briefs
- Newsletters
- Non-Probate Assets
- Nursing Facility Litigation
- Personal Achievements and Awards
- Personal Injury Lawsuits
- Probate
- Punitive Damages
- Reconsideration
- Retirement Benefits
- Reverse Mortgages
- Section 8 Housing
- Settlement of Litigation
- Social Media
- Special Education
- Special Needs Planning
- Surrogate Decision-Making
- Taxation
- Technology
- Texting
- Top Ten
- Trials
- Trustees
- Uncategorized
- Veterans Benefits
- Web Sites and the Internet
- Webinar
- Writing Intended To Be A Will
Vanarelli & Li, LLC on Social Media