Two New Jersey defense attorneys allegedly caused a paralegal to “friend” the plaintiff in a personal injury case so they could access information on his Facebook page that was not available to the public. The Office of Attorney Ethics (OAE) charged that the “friend” request, made “on behalf of and at the direction of” the lawyers, “was a ruse and a subterfuge designed to gain access to non-public portions of [the] Facebook page for improper use” in defending the lawsuit filed by the plaintiff.
No New Jersey ethics opinion specifically addresses “friending” people for litigation purposes. However, the OAE claimed the lawyers’ conduct violated various Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC) governing communications with parties represented by counsel, failure to supervise a non-lawyer assistant, conduct involving dishonesty and violation of ethics rules through someone else’s actions or inducing those violations, and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice. The supervising attorney was also charged with breaching the RPC which imposes ethical obligations on lawyers for the actions of attorneys they supervise.
The defense lawyers are fighting the charges, claiming that, while they directed the paralegal to conduct general Internet research, they never told her to make the request to be added as a “friend” on plaintiff’s private Facebook page. Defense counsel also claimed that they were unfamiliar with the Facebook privacy settings and the distinction between what was public and what was private on the Facebook site.
The Facebook research came to light at the deposition of plaintiff. At that time, defense attorney began asking the plaintiff “very specific” questions about activities he engaged in that were mentioned in his Facebook posts. Days later, the defense served amended answers to interrogatories with a stack of information from plaintiff’s private Facebook pages, including conversations, photos and a video of plaintiff wrestling with his brother. Ultimately, the trial court barred the use of the Facebook evidence, and the case settled.
After the case settled, plaintiff filed a grievance against defense counsel with the county Ethics Committee, but it was rejected without an investigation. Plaintiff then filed his own grievance with the OAE, which investigated and found a basis for ethics charges. A formal ethics complaint was then filed against defense counsel.
Both of the defense attorneys charged have clean disciplinary records and they “fully cooperated” with the OAE investigation. The first hearing on the alleged ethics violations is expected to take place this fall.
An article in the August 30, 2012 edition of the New Jersey Law Journal on the ethics violations in the case can be found here – Hostile Use Of ‘Friend’ Request Puts Lawyers In Ethics Trouble
Categories
- Affordable Care Act
- Alzheimer's Disease
- Arbitration
- Attorney Ethics
- Attorneys Fees
- Beneficiary Designations
- Blog Roundup and Highlights
- Blogs and Blogging
- Care Facilities
- Caregivers
- Cemetery
- Collaborative Family Law
- Conservatorships
- Consumer Fraud
- Contempt
- Contracts
- Defamation
- Developmental Disabilities
- Discovery
- Discrimination Laws
- Doctrine of Probable Intent
- Domestic Violence
- Elder Abuse
- Elder Law
- Elective Share
- End-of-Life Decisions
- Estate Administration
- Estate Litigation
- Estate Planning
- Events
- Family Law
- Fiduciary
- Financial Exploitation of the Elderly
- Funeral
- Future of the Legal Profession
- Geriatric Care Managers
- Governmental or Public Benefit Programs
- Guardianship
- Health Issues
- Housing for the Elderly and Disabled
- In Remembrance
- Insolvent Estates
- Institutional Liens
- Insurance
- Interesting New Cases
- Intestacy
- Law Firm News
- Law Firm Videos
- Law Practice Management / Development
- Lawyers and Lawyering
- Legal Capacity or Competancy
- Legal Malpractice
- Legal Rights of the Disabled
- Liens
- Litigation
- Mediation
- Medicaid Appeals
- Medicaid Applications
- Medicaid Planning
- Annuities
- Care Contracts
- Divorce
- Estate Recovery
- Family Part Non-Dissolution Support Orders
- Gifts
- Life Estates
- Loan repayments
- MMMNA
- Promissory Notes
- Qualified Income Trusts
- Spousal Refusal
- Transfers For Reasons Other Than To Qualify For Medicaid
- Transfers to "Caregiver" Child(ren)
- Transfers to Disabled Adult Children
- Trusts
- Undue Hardship Provision
- Multiple-Party Deposit Account Act
- New Cases
- New Laws
- News Briefs
- Newsletters
- Non-Probate Assets
- Nursing Facility Litigation
- Personal Achievements and Awards
- Personal Injury Lawsuits
- Probate
- Punitive Damages
- Reconsideration
- Retirement Benefits
- Reverse Mortgages
- Section 8 Housing
- Settlement of Litigation
- Social Media
- Special Education
- Special Needs Planning
- Surrogate Decision-Making
- Taxation
- Technology
- Texting
- Top Ten
- Trials
- Trustees
- Uncategorized
- Veterans Benefits
- Web Sites and the Internet
- Webinar
- Writing Intended To Be A Will
Vanarelli & Li, LLC on Social Media