The Director of the Medicaid agency in New Jersey held that income in a Qualified Income Trust which was used to pay the room and board fee for a resident of an assisted living facility was not countable in determining the resident’s eligibility for Medicaid benefits. H.H. v. Monmouth County Board of Social Services – Final Agency Decision, OAL Docket No. HMA 14843-2019 (August 18, 2020)
Helen Harrington resided in a studio room at an assisted living facility (ALF). She paid the facility $187 per day for her room and board fee, $58 per day for additional care required to assist her with her activities of daily living, and $29 per day for the administration of medication. The total ALF cost was $8,520 per month in months with thirty (30) days and $8,844 per month in months with thirty-one (31) days. Between June 1, 2018, and October 31, 2018, the applicant’s total monthly expenses included her medical expenses, the facility costs, $134 that was deducted from her monthly Social Security income, $272.25 for AARP health insurance monthly premium and $78.92 for prescriptions. Thus, the applicant’s total costs each month were $9.005.17 for months with thirty days and $9,329.17 per month in months with thirty-one days.
On May 1, 2018, Ms. Harrington applied for Medicaid Managed Long-Term Care Services and Supports (MLTSS) to pay for her ALF costs. The application was completed by the applicant’s daughter, H.A., who was the applicant’s agent under a power of attorney.
Ms. Harrington’s gross monthly income from Social Security, was $1,734. $134 was deducted from this income each month to pay for Medicare Part B. On May 4, 2018, the applicant purchased a Medicaid compliant annuity with $34,200 of her funds. The annuity paid the applicant five equal, monthly payments of $6,841.29 from June 2018, through October 2018. The annuity met all Medicaid requirements and was non-countable as an asset in that it was non-transferrable, non-assignable, could not be surrendered or commuted, was irrevocable and immediate and had no cash or loan value. In addition, the State of New Jersey was the primary beneficiary upon the petitioner’s death. Thus, for the five month period from June 2018, through October 2018, the applicant’s total gross income per month was $8,575.29.
On May 1, 2018, the applicant established a Qualified Income Trust (QIT). She deposited the monthly income from the annuity into the QIT. On May 26, 2018, the applicant gifted $66,000, which was subject to a five month “gift” penalty under the Medicaid “transfer of assets” rule. The Medicaid agency determined the petitioner was clinically eligible for MLTSS effective February 26, 2018.
On July 23, 2018, the Medicaid agency denied the petitioner’s May 1, 2018 Medicaid application. The denial of benefits was based upon “excess income.” In that regard, the agency claimed that, because the applicant’s monthly gross income of $8,575.29 exceeded the monthly room and board rate of $5,797.00 for a semi-private room at the ALF, Medicaid benefits were unnecessary. The Medicaid agency did not include the applicant’s medical expenses in calculating the monthly cost of care, but only considered the room and board rate for a semi-private room.
After five months in pay status, the Medicaid compliant annuity terminated in October 2018. The applicant, through H.A., filed a second Medicaid application on November 8, 2018. At that time, the applicant’s only monthly income was $1,734 from Social Security.
On February 8, 2019, the Medicaid agency issued a second notice in which it advised that the applicant was subject to a 191-day penalty as a result of the gift of $66,000 in May 2018. As a result, she was ineligible for MLTSS for several months and only became eligible on May 11, 2019.
The applicant filed timely appeals from the denials of both of her claims for Medicaid benefits. The appeals were consolidated, and a hearing before an administrative law judge (ALJ) was held. On appeal, Medicaid contended that the applicant was ineligible for Medicaid on June 1, 2018, and was not eligible until November 1, 2018, because her total income, including her monthly Social Security and annuity income, exceeded the total cost of her expenses in the ALF. In response, the applicant argued that, because her annuity income was properly placed into a QIT, the annuity income should not have been countable in determining Medicaid eligibility. If the annuity income is not counted, the applicant’s monthly Social Security income was insufficient to pay the total ALF costs, including room and board for a semi-private room and her medical expenses. As a result, she was eligible for Medicaid
The ALJ reversed, finding Ms. Harrington eligible for Medicaid benefits. The ALJ held as follows:
[T]he regulations require examination of whether the petitioner’s total income exceeded her total medical costs, including the “private pay costs associated with her nursing home care and other medical expenses” such as Medicare and prescription drug costs. Because the petitioner’s facility and other medical expenses exceeded her total monthly income, which was comprised of her Social Security and annuity income, which was properly deposited in a QIT beginning June 2018, I CONCLUDE the petitioner was eligible for MLTSS effective of June 2018.
As in every Medicaid case, the ALJ’s decision in this case was subject to review by the Director of the state Medicaid agency. After review, the Director reversed and remanded the case back to the ALJ for additional testimony and evidence to determine her room and board expenses, as distinguished from her medical expenses.
On remand, the ALJ held another hearing and held that, based on the remand order, non-medical expenses must be excluded from the calculation of the applicant’s medical expenses. The ALJ found that the applicant’s monthly medical expenses were as follows:
- Service Level 3 – $1,798
- Medication administration – $1,209
- Medicare Part B premium – $134
- Health Insurance premium – $272.25
- Average medication administration costs – $57.27
Together, these expenses constituted the applicant’s total monthly medical expenses. The total amount of these expenses, $3,470.52, was lower than her monthly income. The applicant was, therefore, ineligible for Medicaid because her income exceeded the cost of her medical expenses. The ALJ noted that the applicant incurred a monthly rate for room and board of $8,520 per month in months with thirty days and $8,844 per month in months with thirty-one days. However, the ALJ noted that Medicaid never pays for the room and board charges incurred by a resident of an assisted living facility. The ALJ also found that the applicant’s monthly medical expenses were less than the applicant’s total monthly income each month from June 2018, through October 2018.
The applicant contended that she used the funds in her QIT to pay for her room and board charges, and that her remaining income was less than her total monthly medical expenses. She alleged that, under NJ Medicaid regulations, the funds in her QIT should not have been counted in determining her Medicaid eligibility. The applicant acknowledged that she was responsible for paying for her own room and board, and contended there is no legal authority prohibiting her from using her QIT funds to pay for room and board.
After reviewing the evidence presented, the ALJ found that, based upon the evidence in the record, the applicant’s total monthly income, including the income in the QIT, exceeded her monthly medical expenses. The ALJ held that the funds in the applicant’s QIT should be counted in determining her Medicaid eligibility, and that there was no basis to exclude the QIT funds. As a result, the ALJ affirmed the decision of the Monmouth County Division of Social Services denying Medicaid benefits effective June 2018, and dismissed the applicant’s appeal.
The ALJ’s decision after remand in this case was again subject to review by the Director of the state Medicaid agency. The Director reversed the ALJ’s decision affirming the agency’s denial of Medicaid benefits. The Director held that the applicant was eligible for Medicaid benefits, ruling as follows:
[A]fter a careful review of the voluminous record, including documents presented on remand and in the prior matter, there is a preponderance of evidence that [the applicant’s] income is insufficient to cover her medical expenses. While she may not have provided the full extent of those expenses, the record shows that they were imbedded in the daily rate. When combined with those expenses that were fully enumerated, [the applicant] could establish Medicaid eligibility
The Director’s decision after remand is confusing, so I want to spend time analyzing it. Ms. Harrington was found eligible for Medicaid benefits in this case even though (1) the applicant’s total gross income per month, including her Social Security benefits and annuity income, was $8,575.29 (2) the applicant established a QIT, and deposited the monthly income from the annuity into the QIT (3) the applicant’s total ALF costs each month, including medical expenses and room and board costs, were $9.005.17 for months with thirty days and $9,329.17 per month in months with thirty-one days (4) the applicant’s total monthly medical expenses were $3,470.52, and (5) the monthly room and board rate for a semi-private room at the ALF was $5,797.00. Thus, the applicant’s total monthly income exceeded her total monthly medical expenses when considered alone, and exceeded the total monthly room and board rate at the ALF when that expense is considered alone. Although the applicant’s total ALF costs each month, including medical expenses and room and board costs, exceeded the applicant’s monthly income, Medicaid never considers the monthly room and board rate in determining eligibility because applicants are responsible to pay those costs privately. Therefore, the only way Ms. Harrington could qualify for Medicaid in this case is if the agency did not count the annuity income in the QIT.
From a discussion on another listserv: It’s a confusing decision, but it appears that the Director’s position was that income in a QIT used to pay both monthly room & board as well as medical expenses was not countable in determining eligibility.
If you do the math, the annuity income alone would have pushed H.H.’s gross monthly income over her determined monthly medical expenses at the ALF. Further, when viewed in isolation, the annuity income exceeded the monthly room & board fee at the Assisted Living Facility. Combined, however, the total monthly income fell short of the room & board and monthly medical expenses. Thus, it’s the only conceivable explanation in my opinion. I’m curious if anyone else reads this case differently?
H.H. v. Monmouth County Board of Social Services – H.H. v. Monmouth County Board of Social Services – Agency Denial
H.H. v. Monmouth County Board of Social Services – H.H. v. Monmouth County Board of Social Services – First ALJ Decision
H.H. v. Monmouth County Board of Social Services – H.H. v. Monmouth County Board of Social Services – Remand Decision
H.H. v. Monmouth County Board of Social Services – H.H. v. Monmouth County Board of Social Services – Second ALJ Decision on Remand
H.H. v. Monmouth County Board of Social Services – H.H. v. Monmouth County Board of Social Services – Final Agency Decision
For additional information concerning Medicaid applications and appeals, visit:
- Affordable Care Act
- Alzheimer's Disease
- Attorney Ethics
- Attorneys Fees
- Beneficiary Designations
- Blog Roundup and Highlights
- Blogs and Blogging
- Care Facilities
- Collaborative Family Law
- Consumer Fraud
- Developmental Disabilities
- Discrimination Laws
- Doctrine of Probable Intent
- Domestic Violence
- Elder Abuse
- Elder Law
- Elective Share
- End-of-Life Decisions
- Estate Administration
- Estate Litigation
- Estate Planning
- Family Law
- Financial Exploitation of the Elderly
- Future of the Legal Profession
- Geriatric Care Managers
- Governmental or Public Benefit Programs
- Health Issues
- Housing for the Elderly and Disabled
- In Remembrance
- Insolvent Estates
- Institutional Liens
- Interesting New Cases
- Law Firm News
- Law Firm Videos
- Law Practice Management / Development
- Lawyers and Lawyering
- Legal Capacity or Competancy
- Legal Malpractice
- Legal Rights of the Disabled
- Medicaid Appeals
- Medicaid Applications
- Medicaid Planning
- Care Contracts
- Estate Recovery
- Family Part Non-Dissolution Support Orders
- Life Estates
- Loan repayments
- Promissory Notes
- Qualified Income Trusts
- Spousal Refusal
- Transfers For Reasons Other Than To Qualify For Medicaid
- Transfers to "Caregiver" Child(ren)
- Transfers to Disabled Adult Children
- Undue Hardship Provision
- Multiple-Party Deposit Account Act
- New Cases
- New Laws
- News Briefs
- Non-Probate Assets
- Nursing Facility Litigation
- Personal Achievements and Awards
- Personal Injury Lawsuits
- Punitive Damages
- Retirement Benefits
- Reverse Mortgages
- Section 8 Housing
- Settlement of Litigation
- Social Media
- Special Education
- Special Needs Planning
- Surrogate Decision-Making
- Top Ten
- Veterans Benefits
- Web Sites and the Internet
- Writing Intended To Be A Will