
The New Jersey Supreme Court has amended the Court Rules governing guardianships to establish a new state-wide policy for background screenings of proposed guardians of incapacitated persons. The amendments are effective as of May 15, 2021.
The new policy is intended to safeguard the vulnerable population of incapacitated adults against risks of potential abuse, neglect, and financial exploitation by guardians appointed by the court to make decisions related to their care and financial affairs. The new background screening policy will provide a method for the court to consider a proposed guardian’s civil and criminal judgment history in order to make a fully informed decision as to whether the individual is suitable for appointment.
Proposed guardians will be subject to a fingerprint or computerized criminal history check, and, in some cases, a certified judgment search. Proposed guardians also will be required to self-disclose and certify to any criminal and civil judgment history, acknowledge receipt of and compliance with the policy, and provide periodic reports to the court of any changes to their criminal and civil judgment history. Individuals with any relevant negative history will be provided with notice and an opportunity to be heard by the court as to whether the information discovered would affect the individual’s ability to perform the duties of a guardian.
Certain court rules have been revised. In that regard, R. 4:86-2(b) has been amended to require a petitioner for guardianship to annex to the complaint an affidavit or certification setting forth the criminal and civil judgment history of the proposed guardian. If the complaint does not identify a proposed guardian, the certification shall be filed prior to the entry of the judgment of legal incapacity and the appointment of the guardian. The Administrative Director of the Courts will establish a background screening policy for proposed guardians of incapacitated adults, which may include fingerprinting.
Certain individuals and entities are exempt from the new requirement. These include: parents of allegedly incapacitated children; spouses of allegedly incapacitated persons; those in a civil unions or domestic partnerships with allegedly incapacitated persons; certain temporary guardians; certain agencies; public officials appointed as limited guardians for medical purposes; financial institutions; and attorneys licensed and in good standing in the State of New Jersey. The court, however, may require any of the above individuals and entities to undergo background screening as a prerequisite to appointment based on the facts of the case.
R. 4:86-4 was amended to require the order to show cause to include provisions requiring any proposed guardian to comply with any applicable background screening policy, and to provide that a copy of the policy shall be provided with the order.
R. 4:86-6 requires the guardian’s acceptance of appointment to include an acknowledgment of compliance with any background screening policy for proposed guardians of incapacitated adults promulgated by the Administrative Director of the Courts.
The Notice to the Bar and amended Rules can be found here:
The new court directive, entitled “Directive #11-21 – Guardianships of Incapacitated Adults; Background Screening Policy for Proposed Guardians; New and Revised Court Forms (njcourts.gov),” is attached here –
For additional information concerning guardianships and fiduciary services, visit:
Categories
- Affordable Care Act
- Alzheimer's Disease
- Arbitration
- Attorney Ethics
- Attorneys Fees
- Beneficiary Designations
- Blog Roundup and Highlights
- Blogs and Blogging
- Care Facilities
- Caregivers
- Cemetery
- Collaborative Family Law
- Conservatorships
- Consumer Fraud
- Contempt
- Contracts
- Defamation
- Developmental Disabilities
- Discovery
- Discrimination Laws
- Doctrine of Probable Intent
- Domestic Violence
- Elder Abuse
- Elder Law
- Elective Share
- End-of-Life Decisions
- Estate Administration
- Estate Litigation
- Estate Planning
- Events
- Family Law
- Fiduciary
- Financial Exploitation of the Elderly
- Funeral
- Future of the Legal Profession
- Geriatric Care Managers
- Governmental or Public Benefit Programs
- Guardianship
- Health Issues
- Housing for the Elderly and Disabled
- In Remembrance
- Insolvent Estates
- Institutional Liens
- Insurance
- Interesting New Cases
- Intestacy
- Law Firm News
- Law Firm Videos
- Law Practice Management / Development
- Lawyers and Lawyering
- Legal Capacity or Competancy
- Legal Malpractice
- Legal Rights of the Disabled
- Liens
- Litigation
- Mediation
- Medicaid Appeals
- Medicaid Applications
- Medicaid Planning
- Annuities
- Care Contracts
- Divorce
- Estate Recovery
- Family Part Non-Dissolution Support Orders
- Gifts
- Life Estates
- Loan repayments
- MMMNA
- Promissory Notes
- Qualified Income Trusts
- Spousal Refusal
- Transfers For Reasons Other Than To Qualify For Medicaid
- Transfers to "Caregiver" Child(ren)
- Transfers to Disabled Adult Children
- Trusts
- Undue Hardship Provision
- Multiple-Party Deposit Account Act
- New Cases
- New Laws
- News Briefs
- Newsletters
- Non-Probate Assets
- Nursing Facility Litigation
- Personal Achievements and Awards
- Personal Injury Lawsuits
- Probate
- Punitive Damages
- Reconsideration
- Retirement Benefits
- Reverse Mortgages
- Section 8 Housing
- Settlement of Litigation
- Social Media
- Special Education
- Special Needs Planning
- Surrogate Decision-Making
- Taxation
- Technology
- Texting
- Top Ten
- Trials
- Trustees
- Uncategorized
- Veterans Benefits
- Web Sites and the Internet
- Webinar
- Writing Intended To Be A Will
Vanarelli & Li, LLC on Social Media