A nurse’s aide at a senior care facility in southern Minnesota posted a photograph of an elderly patient with on social media with a demeaning and vulgar message did not violate state law meant to protect patient privacy, a state court ruled. Furlow v. Madonna Summit of Byron, Docket No. A19-0987 (Minn. Ct. of Appeals, January 27, 2020)
V.F. was an elderly patient with Alzheimer’s disease residing in Madonna Summit of Byron (Madonna), a senior living facility in Byron, Minnesota. Jane Doe was a nurse’s aide employed by Madonna.
Jane Doe took a photo of V.F. and posted it to Jane Doe’s personal social-media page. In the photograph, V.F. is sitting in a chair in the background and Jane Doe is in the foreground, her face covered by the phone. There is nothing in the photograph to identify anyone by name nor is there anything indicating that the photograph was taken at Madonna. Jane Doe wrote the following caption on the photo: “This little sh-t just pulled the fire alarm and now I have to call 911!!! Woohoo.” Jane Doe later told state investigators that she posted the photo because she “thought it was funny.”
William Furlow, V.F.’s representative, filed a lawsuit under the Minnesota Health Records Act on V.F.’s behalf, claiming that the social media post violated a state law that prohibits medical providers from sharing private information about the patient’s health condition. Plaintiff claimed that the posting of embarrassing and dehumanizing photos is a new form of maltreatment in senior care facilities, and one that can leave a lasting digital trail.
Madonna filed a motion to dismiss Furlow’s complaint, and the trial court dismissed all claims asserted by V.F. The trial court concluded that Jane Doe’s social media post about V.F. was not the release of a “health record” under the Minnesota Health Records Act, Minn. Stat. §§ 144.291-.298 (2018). V.F. appealed.
The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court ruling, and dismissed V.F.’s complaint. The appeals court ruled that “The Minnesota Health Records Act defines a ‘health record’ as any information, whether oral or recorded in any form or medium, that relates to the past, present, or future physical or mental health or condition of a patient; the provision of health care to a patient; or the past, present, or future payment for the provision of health care to a patient. Minn. Stat. § 144.291, subd. 2(c). [T]he photograph and accompanying caption … do not fall under the definition of a ‘health record’ in the Minnesota Health Records Act.”
The appeals court based its affirmance on the following reasoning:
The photograph here contains [little] identifiable information … . Here, V.F. is seen sitting in a chair. While her hair and eye color are visible, and one could infer her approximate age, there is nothing in the photograph to identify any private medical information, condition, or past, present or future treatment. … [T]here is nothing to identify that [Jane Doe] is working at a nursing home or where she is working. The caption refers to V.F. as a “little sh-t” and that she had pulled the fire alarm. Although Furlow argues that this goes directly to V.F.’s mental capacity, it does not expressly state anything about her past, present, or future physical or mental health condition. … While a viewer of the post may infer that V.F. was receiving care in a nursing home, there is nothing explicitly in the photograph or caption that goes to the nature of the care or condition.
The case is attached here – Furlow v. Madonna Summit of Byron
For additional information concerning nursing home law and litigation, visit:
For additional information concerning probate litigation and will contests, visit:
Categories
- Affordable Care Act
- Alzheimer's Disease
- Arbitration
- Attorney Ethics
- Attorneys Fees
- Beneficiary Designations
- Blog Roundup and Highlights
- Blogs and Blogging
- Care Facilities
- Caregivers
- Cemetery
- Collaborative Family Law
- Conservatorships
- Consumer Fraud
- Contempt
- Contracts
- Defamation
- Developmental Disabilities
- Discovery
- Discrimination Laws
- Doctrine of Probable Intent
- Domestic Violence
- Elder Abuse
- Elder Law
- Elective Share
- End-of-Life Decisions
- Estate Administration
- Estate Litigation
- Estate Planning
- Events
- Family Law
- Fiduciary
- Financial Exploitation of the Elderly
- Funeral
- Future of the Legal Profession
- Geriatric Care Managers
- Governmental or Public Benefit Programs
- Guardianship
- Health Issues
- Housing for the Elderly and Disabled
- In Remembrance
- Insolvent Estates
- Institutional Liens
- Insurance
- Interesting New Cases
- Intestacy
- Law Firm News
- Law Firm Videos
- Law Practice Management / Development
- Lawyers and Lawyering
- Legal Capacity or Competancy
- Legal Malpractice
- Legal Rights of the Disabled
- Liens
- Litigation
- Mediation
- Medicaid Appeals
- Medicaid Applications
- Medicaid Planning
- Annuities
- Care Contracts
- Divorce
- Estate Recovery
- Family Part Non-Dissolution Support Orders
- Gifts
- Life Estates
- Loan repayments
- MMMNA
- Promissory Notes
- Qualified Income Trusts
- Spousal Refusal
- Transfers For Reasons Other Than To Qualify For Medicaid
- Transfers to "Caregiver" Child(ren)
- Transfers to Disabled Adult Children
- Trusts
- Undue Hardship Provision
- Multiple-Party Deposit Account Act
- New Cases
- New Laws
- News Briefs
- Newsletters
- Non-Probate Assets
- Nursing Facility Litigation
- Personal Achievements and Awards
- Personal Injury Lawsuits
- Probate
- Punitive Damages
- Reconsideration
- Retirement Benefits
- Reverse Mortgages
- Section 8 Housing
- Settlement of Litigation
- Social Media
- Special Education
- Special Needs Planning
- Surrogate Decision-Making
- Taxation
- Technology
- Texting
- Top Ten
- Trials
- Trustees
- Uncategorized
- Veterans Benefits
- Web Sites and the Internet
- Webinar
- Writing Intended To Be A Will
Vanarelli & Li, LLC on Social Media