A court in Australia accepted an unsent, draft text message on a mobile phone as an official Last Will and Testament. Nichol v. Nichol
The decedent, Mark Nichol, a 55 year old man, committed suicide in 2016. The decedent’s mobile phone was found on a work bench in the shed where the deceased’s body was found by David Nichol, the deceased’s brother, and his nephew, Jack Nichol, . The following day, the mobile phone was accessed and the following unsent text message was found in an electronic file marked “drafts”:
Nic you and Jack keep all that I have house and superannuation, put my ashes in the back garden with Trish Julie will take her stuff only she’s ok gone back to her ex AGAIN I’m beaten . A bit of cash behind TV and a bit in the bank Cash card pin 3636
MRN190162Q
10/10/2016
My will
The abbreviation “MRN190162Q” matched the deceased’s initials and date of birth, 19 January 1962. The text message was addressed to the deceased’s brother David whose contact details were stored in the deceased’s mobile phone under the abbreviated name “Dave Nic”. The “Julie” mentioned in the text referred to decedent’s spouse, Julie Nichol.
Thereafter, an application for letters of administration based on intestacy was brought by the deceased’s widow Julie. At the same time, David and Jack Nichol brought an application seeking a judgment admitting the unsent text message on the decedent’s mobile phone to probate as his Last Will and Testament.
The decedent’s spouse argued that the fact the text message was not sent indicated that the decedent had not made up his mind about the disposition of his estate. However, the court said the man clearly knew what he was doing by ending the text with the words “my will”. The court also deemed likely that the decedent intended that the message to be found with him.
The court held that the “informal nature” of the message did not prevent it from representing the man’s intentions, especially since it was “created on or about the time that the deceased was contemplating death, such that he even indicated where he wanted his ashes to be placed”. Also according to the court: “The reference to his house and superannuation and his specification that [his spouse] was to take her own things indicates he was aware of the nature and extent of his estate, which was relatively small.”
In conclusion, the court held as follow: “In all of the circumstances I consider that the text message was intended by the deceased to operate as his will upon his death.”
The case is annexed here – Nichol v. Nichol
For additional information concerning probate litigation and will contests, visit: https://vanarellilaw.com/will-contests-probate-litigation-elder-abuse-actions/#iplwc
Categories
- Affordable Care Act
- Alzheimer's Disease
- Arbitration
- Attorney Ethics
- Attorneys Fees
- Beneficiary Designations
- Blog Roundup and Highlights
- Blogs and Blogging
- Care Facilities
- Caregivers
- Cemetery
- Collaborative Family Law
- Conservatorships
- Consumer Fraud
- Contempt
- Contracts
- Defamation
- Developmental Disabilities
- Discovery
- Discrimination Laws
- Doctrine of Probable Intent
- Domestic Violence
- Elder Abuse
- Elder Law
- Elective Share
- End-of-Life Decisions
- Estate Administration
- Estate Litigation
- Estate Planning
- Events
- Family Law
- Fiduciary
- Financial Exploitation of the Elderly
- Funeral
- Future of the Legal Profession
- Geriatric Care Managers
- Governmental or Public Benefit Programs
- Guardianship
- Health Issues
- Housing for the Elderly and Disabled
- In Remembrance
- Insolvent Estates
- Institutional Liens
- Insurance
- Interesting New Cases
- Intestacy
- Law Firm News
- Law Firm Videos
- Law Practice Management / Development
- Lawyers and Lawyering
- Legal Capacity or Competancy
- Legal Malpractice
- Legal Rights of the Disabled
- Liens
- Litigation
- Mediation
- Medicaid Appeals
- Medicaid Applications
- Medicaid Planning
- Annuities
- Care Contracts
- Divorce
- Estate Recovery
- Family Part Non-Dissolution Support Orders
- Gifts
- Life Estates
- Loan repayments
- MMMNA
- Promissory Notes
- Qualified Income Trusts
- Spousal Refusal
- Transfers For Reasons Other Than To Qualify For Medicaid
- Transfers to "Caregiver" Child(ren)
- Transfers to Disabled Adult Children
- Trusts
- Undue Hardship Provision
- Multiple-Party Deposit Account Act
- New Cases
- New Laws
- News Briefs
- Newsletters
- Non-Probate Assets
- Nursing Facility Litigation
- Personal Achievements and Awards
- Personal Injury Lawsuits
- Probate
- Punitive Damages
- Reconsideration
- Retirement Benefits
- Reverse Mortgages
- Section 8 Housing
- Settlement of Litigation
- Social Media
- Special Education
- Special Needs Planning
- Surrogate Decision-Making
- Taxation
- Technology
- Texting
- Top Ten
- Trials
- Trustees
- Uncategorized
- Veterans Benefits
- Web Sites and the Internet
- Webinar
- Writing Intended To Be A Will
Vanarelli & Li, LLC on Social Media