In Shelales v. Director of the Office of Medicaid (Mass.App.Ct., No. 08-P-2052, Oct. 30, 2009), the Massachusetts Appeals Court ruled that the transfer penalty period resulting when an applicant for nursing home Medicaid benefits transferred some of her assets to her children and then gave the remainder to a nursing home as prepayment for care would not begin until the prepaid funds are exhausted.
On January 11, 2007, Mary Shelales transferred $41,993 to her two children and also paid her nursing home $50,447 to cover the cost of her care through July 2, 2007. Ms. Shelales then applied for Medicaid and sought coverage beginning on January 11th, the first day on which she was resource eligible. The state Medicaid agency denied Ms. Shelales’ application and assessed a 164-day penalty period based on the $41,993 transfer to the children. The state also indicated that the penalty period would not begin until June 28, 2007, the date that the state believed that Ms. Shelales’ nursing home prepayment would be exhausted.
Ms. Shelales claimed that the penalty period should begin on January 12th. She based her argument on the wording of the Massachusetts Medicaid regulation governing transfers of resources, which states that “the period of ineligibility begins on the first day of the month in which resources were transferred for less than fair-market value or the date on which the individual is otherwise eligible for MassHealth payment of long-term care services, whichever is later.” Ms. Shelales asserted that she was “otherwise eligible” for Medicaid on the day after she made the transfers, while the state contended that Ms. Shelales was not “otherwise eligible” for Medicaid until the end of June because she had already paid for nursing home care through that time and was therefore self-insured. On appeal, a hearing officer and a Superior Court judge both ruled in favor of the state.
The Massachusetts Appeals Court upheld the state’s determination. The court found that the state’s interpretation of the regulation was reasonable and in accordance with federal Medicaid law. Focusing almost entirely on the purpose behind the Deficient Reduction Act of 2005, the court explained that “MassHealth’s interpretation of its parallel regulation is consonant with the expressed purpose of delaying or even obviating the need for taxpayer- financed care. By extending the commencement date of the disqualification period, the regulation discourages the transfer of assets that could have been used to pay privately for long-term care and prevents placement of the burden of payment for those services on the taxpayer.”
Source: ElderLawAnswers website
Categories
- Affordable Care Act
- Alzheimer's Disease
- Arbitration
- Attorney Ethics
- Attorneys Fees
- Beneficiary Designations
- Blog Roundup and Highlights
- Blogs and Blogging
- Care Facilities
- Caregivers
- Cemetery
- Collaborative Family Law
- Conservatorships
- Consumer Fraud
- Contempt
- Contracts
- Defamation
- Developmental Disabilities
- Discovery
- Discrimination Laws
- Doctrine of Probable Intent
- Domestic Violence
- Elder Abuse
- Elder Law
- Elective Share
- End-of-Life Decisions
- Estate Administration
- Estate Litigation
- Estate Planning
- Events
- Family Law
- Fiduciary
- Financial Exploitation of the Elderly
- Funeral
- Future of the Legal Profession
- Geriatric Care Managers
- Governmental or Public Benefit Programs
- Guardianship
- Health Issues
- Housing for the Elderly and Disabled
- In Remembrance
- Insolvent Estates
- Institutional Liens
- Insurance
- Interesting New Cases
- Intestacy
- Law Firm News
- Law Firm Videos
- Law Practice Management / Development
- Lawyers and Lawyering
- Legal Capacity or Competancy
- Legal Malpractice
- Legal Rights of the Disabled
- Liens
- Litigation
- Mediation
- Medicaid Appeals
- Medicaid Applications
- Medicaid Planning
- Annuities
- Care Contracts
- Divorce
- Estate Recovery
- Family Part Non-Dissolution Support Orders
- Gifts
- Life Estates
- Loan repayments
- MMMNA
- Promissory Notes
- Qualified Income Trusts
- Spousal Refusal
- Transfers For Reasons Other Than To Qualify For Medicaid
- Transfers to "Caregiver" Child(ren)
- Transfers to Disabled Adult Children
- Trusts
- Undue Hardship Provision
- Multiple-Party Deposit Account Act
- New Cases
- New Laws
- News Briefs
- Newsletters
- Non-Probate Assets
- Nursing Facility Litigation
- Personal Achievements and Awards
- Personal Injury Lawsuits
- Probate
- Punitive Damages
- Reconsideration
- Retirement Benefits
- Reverse Mortgages
- Section 8 Housing
- Settlement of Litigation
- Social Media
- Special Education
- Special Needs Planning
- Surrogate Decision-Making
- Taxation
- Technology
- Texting
- Top Ten
- Trials
- Trustees
- Uncategorized
- Veterans Benefits
- Web Sites and the Internet
- Webinar
- Writing Intended To Be A Will
Vanarelli & Li, LLC on Social Media