
The veteran in this case had been residing in a medical facility operated by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) for several years. He was incompetent and had no dependents. The veteran had been receiving VA pension benefits based upon financial need. The Director of the VA facility was serving as veteran’s payee.
The veteran became the beneficiary of a testamentary trust containing over $22,000. Under the terms of the trust, the trustee, in the trustee’s sole discretion, was authorized to provide funds for the veteran’s comfort, but could not provide funds which would substitute for support and maintenance to which the veteran was legally entitled from other sources.
Soon thereafter, the VA pension was terminated. The VA ruled that the veteran was financially ineligible because the veteran exceeded the asset and income limits of the pension program when the assets in the trust were taken into account.
The decision terminating the pension was reviewed administratively, and conflicting decisions were subsequently rendered. First, the District Counsel ruled that receipt of the trust inheritance constituted a bar to receipt of pension benefits, upholding the previous determination. The Surrogate’s Court of Erie County, New York, then ruled that the veteran had no property interest in the trust.
The Director of the VA facility in which the veteran resided then filed an appeal.
On appeal, the Office of the General Counsel (OGC) concluded “that the veteran had no title to or property interest in the assets held in trust.”
In determining eligibility for needs-based pension benefits, the OGC held that property and the income therefrom, including property held in trust, should not be countable as belonging to the veteran unless– (1) it is actually owned by the veteran; (2) the veteran possessed such control over the property that the veteran may direct that it be used for the veteran’s benefit; or (3) funds have actually been allocated for the veteran’s use.
Since the veteran in this case did not hold legal title to or control over the trust property, the OGC concluded that only the portion of the trust property, including trust-related income, that had actually been made available for the veteran’s use, was countable in determining eligibility for needs-based VA pension benefits.
The case is annexed here – VA OPGCPREC 72-90 Discretionary Trust
For additional information concerning VA compensation and pension benefits, visit:
Categories
- Affordable Care Act
- Alzheimer's Disease
- Arbitration
- Attorney Ethics
- Attorneys Fees
- Beneficiary Designations
- Blog Roundup and Highlights
- Blogs and Blogging
- Care Facilities
- Caregivers
- Cemetery
- Collaborative Family Law
- Conservatorships
- Consumer Fraud
- Contempt
- Contracts
- Defamation
- Developmental Disabilities
- Discovery
- Discrimination Laws
- Doctrine of Probable Intent
- Domestic Violence
- Elder Abuse
- Elder Law
- Elective Share
- End-of-Life Decisions
- Estate Administration
- Estate Litigation
- Estate Planning
- Events
- Family Law
- Fiduciary
- Financial Exploitation of the Elderly
- Funeral
- Future of the Legal Profession
- Geriatric Care Managers
- Governmental or Public Benefit Programs
- Guardianship
- Health Issues
- Housing for the Elderly and Disabled
- In Remembrance
- Insolvent Estates
- Institutional Liens
- Insurance
- Interesting New Cases
- Intestacy
- Law Firm News
- Law Firm Videos
- Law Practice Management / Development
- Lawyers and Lawyering
- Legal Capacity or Competancy
- Legal Malpractice
- Legal Rights of the Disabled
- Liens
- Litigation
- Mediation
- Medicaid Appeals
- Medicaid Applications
- Medicaid Planning
- Annuities
- Care Contracts
- Divorce
- Estate Recovery
- Family Part Non-Dissolution Support Orders
- Gifts
- Life Estates
- Loan repayments
- MMMNA
- Promissory Notes
- Qualified Income Trusts
- Spousal Refusal
- Transfers For Reasons Other Than To Qualify For Medicaid
- Transfers to "Caregiver" Child(ren)
- Transfers to Disabled Adult Children
- Trusts
- Undue Hardship Provision
- Multiple-Party Deposit Account Act
- New Cases
- New Laws
- News Briefs
- Newsletters
- Non-Probate Assets
- Nursing Facility Litigation
- Personal Achievements and Awards
- Personal Injury Lawsuits
- Probate
- Punitive Damages
- Reconsideration
- Retirement Benefits
- Reverse Mortgages
- Section 8 Housing
- Settlement of Litigation
- Social Media
- Special Education
- Special Needs Planning
- Surrogate Decision-Making
- Taxation
- Technology
- Texting
- Top Ten
- Trials
- Trustees
- Uncategorized
- Veterans Benefits
- Web Sites and the Internet
- Webinar
- Writing Intended To Be A Will
Vanarelli & Li, LLC on Social Media